2005 heli-ski pickup tail-rotor strike

The TSB occurrence review identifies a heli-ski pickup in which visual references were lost and the tail rotor struck terrain.

ClosedAuthoritative evidenceVerified 22/08/2026 · 1 source

At a glance

Date
2005-01-01
Location
Location not stated in selected summary, British Columbia, CA
Activity
Heli skiing
Operational phase
Landing
Categories
Aviation
Fatalities
Unknown
Serious injuries
Unknown
Party size
Unknown
Operator
Unknown
Flight operator
Unknown
Investigation authority
TSB Canada
Investigation ID
A05P0044

Confirmed facts

  • The event occurred during approach to pick up heli-skiers.
  • The tail rotor struck terrain after visual references were lost.

Timeline

  1. 2005-01-01

    Occurrence

    The TSB occurrence review identifies a heli-ski pickup in which visual references were lost and the tail rotor struck terrain.

What remains unknown

  • Fatality count is unknown.
  • Serious injury count is unknown.
  • Exact date, location, aircraft and operator require the occurrence record.

Sources

  1. 1. TSB Recommendation A90-81 — whiteout occurrence review

    Transportation Safety Board of Canada · Tier A · Primary source · Authority summary · EN

    Published Unknown · Accessed 22/08/2026

    Rights note: Link and attribute; paraphrase only.

Revision history

  1. v2 · 22/08/2026 Published from approved import batch incident-pilot-2026-08.

Corrections and right of reply

If you can provide a primary record, identify an error, or are materially named in this record, contact the editorial desk. We preserve reviewed corrections in the public revision history.

Contact the editorial desk

AI may assist discovery, comparison and drafting; high-risk incident publication requires the newsroom's evidence and policy gates. Victim names are withheld by default.

Join the page

Can you help improve this record?

Share a respectful correction or a reliable source. Please avoid speculation.

0 / 2,000

All comments are reviewed by AI before publication. AI assesses safety and relevance, not whether every factual statement is correct.

0 published comments

Loading comments…